How to scale? · Point of view · 3 min read
Electric trucks turn logistics companies into energy companies, whether they like it or not. Organisations that treat energy as a strategic capability, not a utility bill, will scale fastest.
In short
- The economics of electric logistics are decided by energy: grid connection, contracts, charging strategy and storage.
- Grid capacity, not vehicle technology, is now the main brake on scale-up in the Netherlands.
- Someone at the top has to own vehicles, depots, energy and finance as one system.
Your trucks are now part of an energy system
With diesel, energy was a fuel card. With electric trucks, energy becomes a design question: which grid connection, how much contracted capacity, which tariffs, when to charge, whether to store, whether to generate and whether to share. That is why I keep arguing that every organisation built around a supply chain needs a Chief Energy Officer.
This is not a rhetorical question. In a workshop with one of the world’s largest logistics service providers and its partners, they told us they feel a responsibility, and even see an opportunity, in offering on-site depot charging to others. Will the big logistics players become energy management companies?
The numbers
2026
From this year, battery-electric is the preferred choice for almost every new Dutch truck on TCO and range, before grid limits
Source: TNO for PBL (2026)3.5×
How much lower e-truck adoption stays if fleets can only use spare capacity on existing grid contracts
Source: TNO for PBL (2026)70–80%+
Typical share of truck charging energy that comes from depot charging
Source: ICCT & Fraunhofer ISI (2026)~730
EU charging points above 350 kW dedicated to heavy vehicles (July 2026)
Source: VDA / EAFO (2026)The grid decides the pace
The numbers explain why this matters. TNO’s August 2026 study for PBL finds that, on TCO and range alone, battery-electric is the most attractive choice for almost every new truck from 2026. But if logistics companies can only use the spare capacity on their existing grid contracts, the electric share of the Dutch truck fleet stalls at around 10% in 2030 and 20% in 2040. That is roughly 3.5 times lower than without grid congestion.
Mitigation helps, but only partly. Stationary batteries and time-block contracts could lift that share to at most 31% in 2040 on existing connections. And mobility has low priority in the ACM’s framework for allocating new grid capacity.
“With diesel, energy was a fuel card. With electric trucks, energy becomes a design question.”
Haijo Kampinga
Energy demand is concentrated, and so is the opportunity
Charging demand will not be spread evenly. ICCT and Fraunhofer ISI’s September 2026 analysis finds that depot charging typically accounts for 70–80% or more of truck charging energy in European countries, and that the top 10% of locations account for 60–90% of national charging demand. Around logistics hubs like Venlo, projected demand in 2035 reaches over 1,200 MWh per week with peaks of almost 17 MW, mostly from overnight depot charging.
That makes energy a strategic asset. If you secure capacity in the right places, and design the depot for your 2030 fleet rather than your first three trucks, you build an advantage that competitors cannot copy quickly. As MAN’s latest strategy report puts it: the system, not the truck alone, creates the advantage.
Thanks to Dr. Hussein Basma and his colleagues at ICCT and Fraunhofer ISI for this analysis. The interactive maps in the report are well worth exploring.
What a Chief Energy Officer actually does
- Owns the energy roadmap next to the fleet roadmap: connection capacity, contracts, charging windows, storage and generation.
- Brings energy into planning. Range and charging windows become inputs to the plan, not afterthoughts.
- Builds partnerships behind the meter with landlords, neighbours, energy partners and grid operators, from shared depots to a regional Depot Charging Club.
- Speaks finance. Treats energy cost, grid fees and the value of flexibility as part of TCO.
It doesn’t have to be a new job title. But it does have to be a clear mandate, at the level where decisions about vehicles, real estate and finance come together.
Questions for your next leadership meeting
- Who in our organisation owns grid capacity and energy contracts, and do they have a seat at the fleet table?
- Is our depot designed for the 2030 fleet, or for the first three trucks?
- Where could we share capacity with neighbours, landlords or other operators?
Where EUlectrify fits
EUlectrify connects fleets with charging, energy, storage and financing partners in one place, so the energy side of the business case is designed together with the vehicles instead of being added afterwards.
Get started →Haijo Kampinga
Co-founder & Managing Director, EUlectrify · LinkedIn
Haijo previously worked on supply chain and logistics sourcing strategy at Philips and advised automotive, energy and supply chain clients at KPMG.
Sources
- TNO for PBL: Effecten van netcongestie en mitigerende maatregelen op de adoptie van elektrische vrachtwagens (TNO-2026-17724, August 2026)
- ICCT & Fraunhofer ISI: Spatiotemporal analysis of electric truck charging demand in Europe (Link, Speth, Plötz, Alonso-Villar, Basma; September 2026)
- MAN Truck & Bus: Beyond Diesel, strategy report management summary, with data from the McKinsey Center for Future Mobility (September 2026)
- VDA at the opening of IAA Transportation 2026, reported by Auto-Medienportal
Join the conversation on LinkedIn
- Haijo: Which carrier will have the first Chief Energy Officer? (4 Jun 2026)
- Haijo (NL): Will logistics service providers become energy management companies? (8 Jun 2026)
- Haijo: Every supply chain organisation deserves a Chief Energy Officer (25 Jun 2026)
- Haijo (NL): The grid is the brake (TNO, ICCT, IAA) (30 Sep 2026)
- EUlectrify: Won or lost in logistics yards, depots and corridors (28 May 2026)

